Who is responsible for resolving coding disputes discovered during an audit?

The responsibility for resolving coding disputes discovered during an audit typically falls under the purview of directors or managers. This is because they are often positioned to oversee and manage the overall coding processes within an organization. They have the authority to implement changes, allocate resources, and direct team members towards addressing any discrepancies identified during the audit.

Directors or managers are equipped with the leadership skills necessary to facilitate discussions among staff involved in the coding process, ensuring that everyone understands the findings from the audit and how to correct any issues. They can also coordinate with different departments, ensuring compliance with coding standards and regulations, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of health information management practices.

In contrast, while quality control specialists may play an integral role in the auditing process by identifying errors or discrepancies in coding, their primary focus is typically on maintaining quality standards rather than resolving disputes. Legal counsel is usually involved when there are significant legal implications or compliance issues to consider, rather than day-to-day coding disputes. Compliance officers ensure adherence to regulations but do not usually resolve coding disputes themselves, instead offering guidance and oversight on compliance matters.